*Calling adjectives society born between 1946 and 1964* Microchip inserted to monitor your strength?
What if this was the singular way that you could stay at home rather than going into a nurture home or hospital?
THANK YOU
Answers: I would need to be convinced that it wouldn't be abused.
For example the Scottish Parliament have given adjectives people over the age of 60 a card which entitles them to free bus travel.
The only snag is that it is also man used to access other services. Therefore it is an identity card in another guise.
You would have to bring in 100% sure that this microchip was not being used to monitor movement around the country etc.
This sound out is for family that already get their tongue pierced.. PLZ, Thanks?
NO
12/06/1958
London
Still no, I'd bring my chances thank you all like.
There is nothing that could convince me this microchip couldn't be used for other purposes by the Government. They have already passed legislation allowing unprecedented intrusion into our lives, and proved themselves incapable of keeping not detrimental private information. Paranoid? Maybe, but justifiably so in this day and age.
How long does Imodium later within your body?
Yes, I'd own it. ~
I suffer ill health and I own a chronic condition that could turn cancerous at any time, so it would certainly be something to keep you stress free knowing that at the first sign of metamorphosis steps could be taken to combat or lessen the symptoms.
I was born in '57 contained by England.
How do i ask my mom to stop smoking?
yes, 07/04/1960,Newcastle upon tyne,if proven safe,taken into account how lots people who have died contained by there homes and laid there for days even weeks since being discovered,or a single oap who has a heart attack and no means of access of raising the alarm,and I'm sure if ppl stopped looking at the negatives and started to look at the positives they would see what a excellent concept, wierd question but i suppose it could work - if the nhs wasnt on its knees
Oh, *! Need Answer Now! Possible Serious Problem!?
"(if all be proven completely safe)"
I would have thought that by the time you get to the age where on earth you'd be in a university you'd have already realize that this is a non sequitur. Don't you ever watch television? See advertisement for medicines? Notice the disclaimers? They're sometimes ridiculous, like the sleep aid that say "warning, may cause drowsiness", and the heartburn remedy that warn "may cause stomach upset." So the FDA approves these drugs and judging by the warning, they are not "completely safe", and you want to ask us about a microchip on the assumption that it's "completely safe?" How something like we add in for the skeptics that it will also know how to know when you're going to wake up in the morning and alert your spouse's microchip and give an account her to have the coffee ready? It's a preposterous notion.
Here's something else that's preposterous. "transport information wirelessly to a doctor to review". What are you going to do, attune these things directly to a doctor, or are you just hoping that someone is actually in that 24/7 to read the results? Have you ever tried to get ahold of a doctor at any time? They're BUSY. They are NOT going to be watching the screen waiting for the "Bat-Signal". If anyone IS watching, it isn't even going to be 911 operator, because the chips will be sending data CONSTANTLY, and the actual emergencies will be few and far between.
But let's pretend for purely a moment that it would be safe and would work and someone is monitoring. Grandpa starts to have heart fibrillations, and the chip sends out the distress beckon, meanwhile he takes himself a lie-down because he's feeling tired and that's adjectives he knows. Ten minutes later, the paramedics come busting through the door to gather him, and he goes into full cardiac arrest.
What the people that are looking for this and other panacea need to come to grips with is that we are adjectives going to die of some medical cause eventually. You can delay it, but you can't shift that ultimate result. NOTHING is "safe". It doesn't exist, never will, because even those substances that you cannot live without (H20, NaCl, etc) will massacre you if they get too far out of balance next to each other. There simply aren't enough doctors, gadget, medicines, hospitals, and band-aids to keep anyone (let alone everyone) alive forever, so spare me the "miracle gadgetry" if you want me to believe it is "safe", and spare me "national vigour care" if you want me to believe we'll all get more than we receive by paying for it out of our own pockets.
The LAST thing I want is any kind of strength care provided by fools, and only a fool would believe this will be "safe".
Oh, an extra thing. When I was a kid, we raise cattle. We tattooed them. We did that to know one from another for their medical records. They were eventually sold and eat. I really don't want the government to tattoo me, and the chip is the same item for the same purpose.
Resolved Questions...