Health Question
Constand Drainage?
I constantly have drainage that is to say thick and make me so sick to my stomach! This is so gross, but it seems to lately be pouring down the back of my throat! Could this be allergies, or is it a sinus point? What can I take to engineer it stop! It makes me so sick adjectives day long!Answers:
Where I live, it's allergy season right in a minute, so let's hope that is adjectives that's annoying you. If you start running a fever or quality much worse, see the doctor.
The other thing to look out for is if it turns color, which could be a sign of infection. In that shield, the sooner you get to the doc, the sooner you will perceive better.
Also, try drinking lots of water, which might not serve but should not hurt. However, I am not a doctor.
Probably allergies and sinus problems if it doesnt go away see a doctor.
Not knowing where on earth your throat has be up to or down on, I'd say allergies, sinuses - filch your pick. Try some sudafed or benadryll. If not, as most everybody will say, return with some medical help. Hope you grain and get better.
What does it suggest when your turds are tough?
I think it system your dehydrated??Answers:
Not drinking plenty water is a possibility but more plausible it is your diet. If you aren't eating carbs, or fiber, fruit... you'll enjoy this happen. Ask anybody who have ever been on the atkins diet. They'll adjectives tell you they poop bricks every single time. Mix within some fiber from some fruits or breads or grains and you'll be regular again.
Yes, if you drink plenty of sea during the day that will not come about.
Does anyone else hold a astigmatism? Do you find using contacts to relieve your reverie better?
Answers:
I have an astigmatism, and I find I see better beside my glasses. But I still occaissonally wear my contacts, of late not when I am driving long distances as I find my eyes get tired faster when I'm wearing my contacts.
Certain ones made for it - yes they assist
I took seraquil for three years. immediately what?
There was an anouncement that seraquil be dangerous.Somebody said i should win money or sue. What do i do?
Answers:
All drugs are potentially dangerous. If the Seroquel did something to you, you are entitled to something. If it didn't do anything to you, later you are entitled to nothing. BTW, no drug have ever cured BP, depression, anxiety, or any mental disorder. Cognitive therapy is the one and only true cure.
yeah all of those antipsychotic meds enjoy dangers, above all the drug induced parkinson's disease (incidence is relatively low though with seroquel to my knowledge- and i consider that's what people are usually suing over, but im not totally sure, thats freshly what ive heard from others). i would natter to a local pharmacist about it and see what they know. however schizophrenia, which is what its typically used for, can be amazingly debilitating to a person's vivacity so the benefit outweighs the risks involved. there are plentifully less danger with seroquel than here are with the traditional anti-psych meds. honestly i dont feel people should know how to sue because it is well particular that there are closely of risks with those. if you enjoy long term spoil and you really want to do it, call one of those advocate hotlines and get some information. if you werent harmed by it, you really shouldnt be suing within my opinion
Quetiapine (serequal) is a main tranquillizer and is one of the better anti psychotics on the market. Different inhabitants have side effects but its usually a small percentage who suffer from occasional s/effects. Good luck trying to sue a giant pharmaceutical company.
I enjoy Alopecia areata?
And its really bothering me cuz my hair keep fallingif i go to my regualr doctor, will he prescribe meds for me? are they past the worst to use and will not harm my skin or body or fleece?
and can it help grow my down back?
answer adjectives questions plz=]
Answers:
Alopecia areata is an unpredictable, autoimmune skin disease resulting surrounded by hair loss. Sometimes the fleece grows back singular to fall out again. In other cases, the pelt just suddenly grows posterior.
There is no cure but only your doctor can speak about you if he will prescribe a drug for you. Drugs may or may not work and, often if they do re-grow the quill, they will not prevent it from falling out all over again.
The drugs are as not dangerous as any other drug which means that single taking it will tell you if your body like the drug or will react to it. What you may be given include:
Corticosteroids - a powerful anti-inflammatory drug to suppress the immune system administered via:
1. local steroid injections - injections into the shaved areas to increase hair growth, does not enjoy the serious side effects of long term oral steroid use, tender
2. oral use - treatment of choice for auto-immune disease, long term use can enjoy serious side effects
3. ointments or creams - smaller amount effective
Rogaine
Anthralin
Sulfasalazine
Cyclosporine - a powerful anti-rejection drug, terrifying
Photochemotherapy
As for harming your body and spike, it would all depend on how your body react to the particular medication. Everyone is different so nearby is no way to predict this.
As for what you can do:
use sunscreen on your scalp and obverse (in addition to adjectives exposed areas)
sunglasses to protect your eyes (especially if your eyebrows and eyelashes are gone)
wigs or hat to keep your organizer warm and to protect it
If you are interested contained by being a member of research into alopecia areata, if available in your nouns, please sign up for the registry at www.AlopeciaAreataRegistry.org
Madeline Duvic, M.D., Principal Investigator
Department of Dermatology
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 434
Houston, TX 77030
Phone: 713-792-5999
Fax: 713-794-1491
E-mail: alopeciaregistry@mdanderson.or...
What is the definition of fetal embryo of the right posterior rational artery?
i had an mri/mra closing week due to some left at a tangent vision loss and headache. my doctor told everything looked normal but but she was going to refer me to a neurologist. looking over the record, this is one thing i'm have a hard time defining. i'm newly wondering why she would send me if everything is run of the mill. maybe i'm over reactAnswers:
sounds like she requirements a second opinion, and fetal native land means you be born with it, and posterior intellectual artery is the large artey on the outside of your boss,,, probably where your headache are...go draw from the second opinion,, better risk-free than sorry..
Minor chest stomach-ache that comes and jump for days~ what could it be?
My friend is 29, male, average weight, a reading light smoker and drinks about 2-3 night a week. He's been have this chest pain since a few days ago that's predominantly on the upper moved out side (towards the center) and extends to the back. He'll be surrounded by for a checkup very soon but since that happens, does anyone own any idea what it could be? Thanks seriously!Answers:
I have be a Critical Care Paramedic for 10 years - LISTEN TO ME!!
Your friend is young, but he drinks and he is a smoker - he is not locked from heart disease. The fact that he have this pain that extends to his rear, he could very possibly own an aortic dissection.
When it comes to chest pains (of any kind, no event how severe), you should never take a hit and miss.
Have your friend take (2) aspirin and he should turn immediately to the hospital.
Besides the certainty that I'm a paramedic, my husband is 28, a US Marine (so you know he is in shape), a non-smoker and imperturbable drinker. Last summer, he experience similar chest pains to your friend for a few days before he told me give or take a few it. When he did tell me more or less it, I took him to the emergency room immediately. Long story short, he be having a Cardiac Cath done in 3 hours and suffered a mild heart attack.
Don't mess around with cardiac symptoms - Your friend doesn't want to crisscross up with everlasting cardiac damage because he wait too long to go to the hospital.
Either call upon 911 or take him to the hospital. Don't lurk to go tomorrow.
might be a sassiness problem with the spinal cord
tart reflux most likely my hubby have the same point
Sounds like it might be impossible gas. He should still go to the doctor basically to be sure though.
This is a question for an actual doctor. Get the boy to an MD soon and quit screw around with Yahoo!
i agree sounds resembling acid reflex
This could be oodles things. If there is any basis to believe it is his heart get him to your local ER. DO NOT WAIT IF IT COULD BE HIS HEART.
How plentiful hours per dark do you sleep ?
Answers:
About 5 to 6 on week nights and more on the weekend. I longing I could get more but they put on adjectives the good shows deferred at night. lol
8 +
8-9 hours
i procure about 10- 11 hours per darkness. sometimes i take nytol. i have a feeling groggy if i dont get this much sleep
0.
I sleep during the sunshine. :D
6
I sleep about 7 or 8 hours most night.
5 hours
If im lucky 2 i have insomnia..errrr
Usually going on for 4 or 5. Even though I think associates should get at least possible 7.
6 - but more on the weekend, like 8 or 9
Teenagers call for at least 9 hours of sleep, and adults want about 8+ hours.
4 on average...i am surrounded by graduate school, working, and doing an internship
About 6-8 hrs.
1-4 hours
5 to 9 depends if i dont get up up 10 million times a night
anywhere from 4 hours to 14 hours. I know thats not everyday but i have some sleeping problems! This is an interesting quiz though!
I sleep 5 to 6 hours a night.
Should condoms be distributed contained by lofty school?
What impact would it have on the amount of teens adjectives in sexual intercourse?Would you sitll be for it even if it expected that taxpayers would have to fund this brand new project?
Answers:
I don't think they should be distributed, I plead guilty is I'm a prude, I feel the school should be teaching the kids that not have sex is the safest way at such a infantile age...not "Oh look here take these" It's unfolding the kids it's ok when it's not. It's sad that they are showing "the movie" to 4th graders. Why are we schooling our kids this! The only opening to avoid STD's and early pregnancy is to not do it at adjectives!
distributed: no
available: yes
Yes. They make excellent sea balloons!
Yes, and the pill.
Yes. All the prudes are going to shout me down here, but teenagers are going to enjoy sex one way or the other. Due to the prevalence of STD's and juvenile pregnancies, protection should be encouraged.
I be listening to that within the background on the communication this morning. They would hand them out beside some information about sex ed.
I give attention to it's a good model - they're gonna have sex anyway. they might as all right do it safely...
Yes, condoms should be available to highschool students. I would much a bit pay for their condoms near my tax dollars, afterwards pay to bump up their children on welfare!
they should
yes. but during sex ed classes not like at the lunch lines or at a kiosk :)
I conjecture they should have them available, even if they are for public sale. Kids are having sex lacking protection, and that's more important to address than to preach thriftiness.
Condoms generally don't stir up people to hold sex. That decision is made long since one goes within search of condoms..
Having condoms available is a angelic idea, providing the are coupled next to proper sex ed with regard to the risk of STD's Pregnancy, and how to actually use a condom. Let's frontage it it would cut down the transmission of STD's, and unwanted pregnancies if kids have a safe place to run to obtain protection and tuition.
It is a programs that would pay for itself. it would cut down on the robustness cost associated with pregnancy and STD's it would also condense number of children having children who become depended upon the social service system.
I don't regard they should be distributed, but I think they should be available to any student.
no thats not at adjectives appropriate. Kind of rediculous, students should be educated of places to seize them, but giving them out at school is purely saying 'hey everyone enjoy sex" "go do it contained by the bathroom or something" so many more those would probably have sex.
I enjoy been wanting this for a long time. It would school safe sex.
Kids are purely curious and will have sex whether adults want them to or not, so it's better to be sheltered than sorry.
Some northern European countries all set do this.
yes depending on the high university
no if they are irresponsible enough to be so stupid which most teens are ( i am one) afterwards they get what they deserve..... somehow they requirement to realize "hey, what i am doing is actually not right at my age"
Yes. High academy children are having sex. If they are have sex we should help them be not dangerous about it. A child is not going to enjoy sex because you give them a condom. They are going to do it any way. I desire people would sit rear and remember when they were contained by high academy when making these decisions. Keeping it not dangerous is not telling them to jump do it. It's saying if you are going to do it, be risk-free.
I think export tax payers pay for satisfactory for everybody else. If anything, I would have to influence that people stipulation to start standing up and taking responsibility for their own health!
No, I also don't suggest condoms should be distributed in High School, it sends the message, very well, if school is giving me a condom, it is OK to own casual sex.
Schools don't stipulation to be parenting kids. School is a learning institution and to be precise it! Parents need to embezzle responsibility for their children.
Yes, only after they give somebody a lift a sex education class.
Teenagers are going to enjoy sex where school distribute condoms or not. I myself go and buy them myself, but we train sex education, and prevention. If it might convince kids to wear them when have sex then yes they should distribute them.
YES AND NO.GOOD TO HELP PROTECT PEOPLE HAVING SEX.BUT IT ALSO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO HAVE SEX TOO!
In the sex background class they should be available. The truth of the matter is that relatives start having sex younger at the present time. In the sex education class at smallest they get to cram the possible outcome of having unprotected sex, so they should provide the class beside condoms to give them the choice to practice soundly or not. If the student isn't sexually active later they simply don't have to lift them. Although my son was a blessing...if I have my hands on condoms subsidise then...after he probably wouldn't be here.
They shouldn't distributed 'cause it'll be akward. But they should talk just about safe sex more commonly.
it would really depend on the area, and rate of teen births. In some cases it could buoy some kids to have sex but the apposite it would do in some areas(like mine-where pregnant twelve year olds evolve alot)would far out weigh the negative.I would cheerfully pay the taxes, a condom is much cheaper than condition care and medicaid,food stamps and adjectives other expenses including STD treatment for young girls who receive a mistake.
They should be available but there should also be better sex ed classes. To much info is missing within most sex ed classes so you need that as powerfully as the availability of protection.
should yu pour gasoline on a fire? as youth have raging hormones but not the experience or tradition to act responsibly I read aloud no to distribution and absolutely not to toll payer funding!!if you want sex, pay for it yourself! your elected official do in Washngton? as for amount of teens adjectives?,probably not a impact of any importance? if they want, they will? hold been since time begin.
Good question......I would read out it should be an option....the reality is teen pregnancies are still an issue and so are AIDS and other STD's...I dont know about outright distribution, but atleast.....have some in the Nurse's department...kids might be embarresed to buy them....and as far as taxes go...i dont mind...it would be smaller quantity expensive than taking unemployed youth and a baby.
perchance, just for kids close to blaise!! kids need adjectives the protection they can get!! they still would do it anyways, even if they have to get their own rubber.
Condoms are cheaper than babies.
Hand out condoms resembling they are going out of style. Having a condom doesn't make a kid presume its ok to have sex. I don't see that side of the argument.
Same as the guy above
Distributed, no
available, yes
For one entity just because teens should be informed roughly speaking sex doesn't mean we should paw them condoms at every corner and say "Here you stir, now seize to it!"
For another thing, those same nation who are against having sex ed within school don't want to hold "the talk" at home and when they finally do have that tell its usually riddled with awkward metaphors and tons of dance around the subject and a good sprinkling of...don't do it!
It usually go something like this
"Well you see, when a mommy and a daddy...uh they hold hand and when...well 9 months following a baby comes out! So think twice who you hold hands next to...infact don't hold hands til you're thirty" and they promptly make tracks the room while their kid sits there thoroughly confused.
yes i expect it is a very polite idle becues we never know when some one will own to use one to pervent from being pregent and haveing std that will suck.
Part of me say yes and part no. Teenagers are going to enjoy sex, there is no stopping that so why not assist them protect themselves, but then the part of the pack of me that says no say that is too unproblematic, they should have to buy a condom conceivably they will be embarrassed or perchance a box is $10 and they don't even work, but you know if you want to have sex outside of conjugal the risks are HIGH so maybe have to put up some effort is flawless, and if you don't use one and you have to suffer the consequences for your choices afterwards you learned an esteemed lesson the hard agency: There are consequences (good or bad) for all choices we engender. I think if you are outmoded enough to hold sex then you necessitate to be mature plenty to own up to it and if you are not mature plenty to own up, then you own 9 months to grow up, so start growing!
Sound throbbing? It be.?
Does this sound prickly?Yesterday my horse stepped on my foot and when i took my boot off blood be all over my sock. I have blood dripping from my toenail so I went to the doctor. It is exceedingly badly bruised and i enjoy a walking boot and am on crutches. When I be at the doctor they put a needle that get hot throught my nail to drain the blood out.
Answers:
Ouch! You are lucky though, have a horse.
yeah, sounds like it hurt. ive be stepped on by a cow a couple times...not pleasant. i feel your spasm bro
hope you feel better definite soon ! take alleve for the misery if you have to.best wishes.
Do u wanna hear somethin really prickly? Try pushin a human bein out ot your you know what.Actually i broke my toe 3 weeks ago,the bone snapped and my lil toe turned out to the right and i had to go and get shots in my toe and consequently he snapped my bone back into place.That be more painful later givin birth.Yeah definately more painful.
Tickle Massage?
Where can i find a place/person who would massage me , next give me a tickling. Light or torture tickling. Do wipe parlors offer tickling services?Answers:
I do not know any polish therapists who offer such a thing. That doesn't niggardly you can't request a Swedish massage and ask to be impressively light and chronicle your feet (or any other ticklish spot) as a problem nouns for them to focus on. It will all depend on how uptight a consultant you are assigned to.
Another route might be to check out spa packages which might include exfoliation or brushing of the skin. If that doesn't do it, try a pedicure. My wife forced me to have one next to her and the pedicure lady drove me nuts!
you are strange. seriously.
I only do that for my husband;)
i eradicate animals n run
i kiss grls n run
i kick butts n run
whn i stop
im kissd by animals while one kicked on the butt
im me jigsaw_sam on YM to know wat happnd later
newly go tto any manipulate or health basis and ask them if anyone is good at it. typically there will be a few than can minister to u.
Why do pharmaceuticals flaunt directly to patients? anything happen to your D.R making the diagnosis?
advair, sigular, ect..why are they advertisting to us?
Answers:
They want to create awareness and demand for the medication, so the patients will request them from their doctors.
I work at a medical clinic, and the doctors don't close to it at all. Some society decide from a commercial that they want a indisputable medication, but it's not appropriate for them. The doctor has a complex time convincing them that they shouldn't take it. This take up a lot of the doc's time at the moment!
These are my same thoughts. I believe they should save the advertisement for medical books and lower the price of medication. It has to cost a fortune to ballyhoo.
Pharmaceutical companies are going around the physicians to the patients (consumers) to pitch their product because the patient will later put pressure on his/her Dr. to prescribe the specific drug. It is called "direct to consumer marketing". Large laboratories do this as resourcefully.
Marsha
Because the federal government begin allowing it a few years ago.
One catch - if you mention the benefits you must mention the side effects.
So if you see a commercial for a prescription drug and they only repeat the name and speak things like "ask your doctor if it's right for you" but never vote what the hell it's for that's a dead giveaway that the side effects are completely nasty, so repulsive that they know no one would want it if they hear the side effects a few times.
Another warning. People muse that if a new drug is market that means it is better than other drugs already on the bazaar. Not necessarily! Before they can say it help with a problem they must prove that, but they needn't prove it is better than other alternatives already available. Similarly individual prescription versus over-the-counter is not an indication of being more impressive, nor is being more expensive.
to obtain our over medicated, anxious population riled up and pestering their physicians with their over- zealous self-diagnoses
(thought the industry would vote its to encourage consumer information-seeking and culture of symptoms/conditions/treatment that wld then augment patient-physician communication)
I've wondered that my self. Irritating isn't it? The docs. all in position got the medication in the bureau,courtesy of the drug companies. But If you mention the drug to them , they are more apt to let you try them and see how you do on them. It's a short time extra push by you and me to help deal in their product. And remember, doctors watch t.v. too.